Three blocks of files in the directory
	http://rupley.com/~guest/EEEHA


EEEHA Newsletter

   eeeha-newsletter-050404.pdf
   	FINAL VERSION (3/24/05)

   eeeha-newsletter-050322.pdf
	draft version
	needs filling in, e.g., April party info.
	needs vetting, e.g., is Chris ok with being reference person?
	needs style/grammar/spelling check...


EEEHA Bylaws:

	Text file of the 10/10/89 bylaws,
		eeeha-bylaws.txt
	and text file and formatted file with suggested changes.
		eeeha-bylaws-mod.txt
		eeeha-bylaws-mod.mm-acrobat.pdf

	The formatted file 
		eeeha-bylaws-mod-diffmk-mm.pdf
	has right-margin changebars, indicating the location of
	suggested changes.

	Best look at the last file above, in conjunction with a copy 
	of the 1989 bylaws.... 
	or 
	the following diff file.
		eeeha-bylaws-mod-txt-diff.txt
	in conjunction with the file 
		eeeha-bylaws-mod-nl.txt
	which is the file
		eeeha-bylaws-mod.txt
	with line numbers added.


	The diff file shows the changed ("<" starts a line) and 
	original text (">" starts line), with line numbers.  
	The changes are for 
		eeeha-bylaws.txt -> eeeha-bylaws-mod.txt

	The suggested changes are meant as a basis for discussion.
	They are not likely to be exhaustive.


EEEHA Neighborhood Directory:

	FINAL VERSION  (3/24/05)
	(.375" margins, 2 board telno changes, claravista -> clara
	vista in text and on map, proofed again by jar vs old
	directory and vs dbase diff file, ....)
		book-sig-centerfold-375i-100r-web.pdf
			signature page sequence
			embedded fonts
			low resolution map
		book-psnup-375i-100r-p2p-web.pdf
			normal page sequence
			fonts not embedded
			low resolution map


	pdf files of the current version of the directory: the
	easier to read are
		book-psnup-*.pdf.

	Note that there are two margin sizes.
	Which is most appealing?

	Several text files describe changes in the address/telno
	dbase:
		the diff file
			diff-040422-050302.txt
		compares a [nearly] current version vs the 040422 version
		(last directory);

		the file
			changes-040422-050302.txt
		gives just the lines of the [nearly] current version that
		have been changed -- it may be the easier to read.


	Comment:

		Tom Bever found an error in the telephone number
		for what I thought was a correct listing -- one of
		11 I had not checked last year. Checking the other
		10 showed yet another error.  Also, the version of
		the directory posted at the time of the February
		22 board meeting (still present in the directory
		"050222" below this directory) contained two lines
		the result of an algorithm error -- the word "dummy"
		was twice used to separate entries in the by address
		listing ("dummy" is not intended as social comment,
		but as an easy-to-see flag for a variable used
		wrongly).

		The point is, please proofread the directory -- one
		imagines there are more mistakes.

		Especially as the code to produce it was altered to
		correct the algorithm error.

		The directory will have to go to press within a
		week if it is to be sent out before the April picnic.